The New York Times blubbers about how Cuba's environment will suffer in a post-U.S. embargo era of increased tourism. Better to preserve a "priceless ecological resource" than to free people from oppression. It is becoming increasingly more difficult to take the environmental movement, and science and environmental reporters, seriously because of stories such as the Christmas Day hand-wringer "Conserving Cuba, After the Embargo."
Thursday, December 27, 2007
Freedom for Cuba will damage environment
The New York Times roots for the continued enslavement of the people of Cuba, Babalu Blog reports.
Investors Business Daily points it out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment